State v. Brock

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brock

306 S.W.3d 654, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2010 WL 623718

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 93294·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*655 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Brock appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his “Motion for Re-Sentencing Where Section 600.051 Prohibits Current Sentence.” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.15(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*655 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Brock appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his “Motion for Re-Sentencing Where Section 600.051 Prohibits Current Sentence.” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.15(b).

State v. Brock, 306 S.W.3d 654, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2010 WL 623718 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

306 S.W.3d 654 (State v. Brock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related