State v. Brock

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brock

306 S.W.3d 654, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2010 WL 623718

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketED 93294

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 S.W.3d 654 (State v. Brock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brock, 306 S.W.3d 654, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2010 WL 623718 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

*655 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Brock appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his “Motion for Re-Sentencing Where Section 600.051 Prohibits Current Sentence.” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.15(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*655 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Brock appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his “Motion for Re-Sentencing Where Section 600.051 Prohibits Current Sentence.” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.15(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 654, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2010 WL 623718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brock-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack