Goodloe v. State

306 S.W.3d 654, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2010 WL 623622
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 92809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ricky J. Goodloe appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 24.035 1 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodloe v. State, 306 S.W.3d 654, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2010 WL 623622 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

306 S.W.3d 654 (Goodloe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brock
306 S.W.3d 654 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)