State v. Brock

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brock

382 S.W.3d 146, 2012 WL 3670702, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1033

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brock. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 202 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2012·No. No. ED 97954·Published

Opinion

[147]*147 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Brock (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his “Motion for Re-Sentencing on the Kidnapping Count in Light of Head v. State.”

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[147]*147 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Brock (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his “Motion for Re-Sentencing on the Kidnapping Count in Light of Head v. State.”

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Brock, 382 S.W.3d 146, 2012 WL 3670702, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1033 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

382 S.W.3d 146 (State v. Brock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.