State v. Bierbrauer

193 P.3d 1054, 222 Or. App. 521
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 8, 2008·No. 060748401; A135243·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a firearm pursuant to ORS 166.250(1)(b). A person violates that statute if he or she “[possesses a handgun that is concealed and readily accessible to the person within any vehicle[.]” Id. Defendant possessed a concealed handgun in a boat, and she argues on appeal that the boat was not a “vehicle” within the meaning of the statute. The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to convict defendant because the definition of “vehicle” for purposes of ORS 166.250(1)(b) does not include a boat. We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bierbrauer, 193 P.3d 1054, 222 Or. App. 521 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

193 P.3d 1054 (State v. Bierbrauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. BIERBRAUER
193 P.3d 1054 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)