State v. BIERBRAUER

193 P.3d 1054, 222 Or. App. 521, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1329
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. BIERBRAUER. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 Or. App. 521
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 1, 2008·No. 060748401 A135243·Published

Opinion

193 P.3d 1054 (2008)
222 Or. App. 521

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Laura C. BIERBRAUER, Defendant-Appellant.

060748401; A135243.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted August 1, 2008.
Decided October 1, 2008.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Zachary Lovett Mazer, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Nick M. Kallstrom, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals a conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a firearm pursuant to ORS 166.250(1)(b). A person violates that statute if he or she "[p]ossesses a handgun that is concealed and readily accessible to the person within any vehicle[.]" Id. Defendant possessed a concealed handgun in a boat, and she argues on appeal that the boat was not a "vehicle" within the meaning of the statute. The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to convict defendant because the definition of "vehicle" for purposes of ORS 166.250(1)(b) does not include a boat. We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. BIERBRAUER, 193 P.3d 1054, 222 Or. App. 521, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1329 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

193 P.3d 1054 (State v. BIERBRAUER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bierbrauer
193 P.3d 1054 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)