Home/Oregon Supreme Court/State v. Berger

State v. Berger

94 P. 181, 51 Or. 166, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 46
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1908·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

1.

Per Curiam.

Motion to dismiss an appeal. The notice of appeal was given in open court, • as provided in Section 549, B. & C. Comp, of the Civil Code. The Criminal Code provides that a notice of appeal in a criminal action must be served upon the clerk of the court and the district attorney of the county in which [167] the judgment roll is filed: B. & C. Comp. §§ 1468, 1469. This code is complete within itself, and the sections of the Civil Code in reference to appeals do not apply to criminal actions: State v. Ellis, 3 Or. 497; State v. Bovee, 11 Or. 57 (4 Pac. 520).

2. The appeal must therefore be dismissed for want of compliance with the requirements of law: State v. Horner, 36 Or. 68 (59 Pac. 549); State v. Blazier, 36 Or. 97 (60 Pac. 203). Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Berger, 94 P. 181, 51 Or. 166, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 46 (Or. 1908).

94 P. 181 (State v. Berger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Montgomery
657 P.2d 668 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
Broom v. Alexander
255 P.2d 1081 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1953)
Huffman v. Alexander
253 P.2d 289 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1952)
State v. Stone
166 P.2d 980 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Rosser
91 P.2d 295 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)
State v. Fehl
52 P.2d 1118 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)
State v. Archerd
24 P.2d 5 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
State v. Berg and McAweeney
4 P.2d 628 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
State v. Way
251 P. 761 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Mageske
249 P. 364 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)