Home/Oregon Supreme Court/State v. Mageske

State v. Mageske

249 P. 364, 227 P. 1065, 119 Or. 312, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 229
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 249 P. 364 (State v. Mageske) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mageske, 249 P. 364, 227 P. 1065, 119 Or. 312, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 229 (Or. 1926).

Opinions

McBride, C. J.

The defendants having been convicted of the crime of unlawfully possessing mash, wort and wash fit for distillation, attempted to appeal to this court. The notice of appeal was directed to and served upon the district attorney, but no notice was served upon the clerk of the court.

Section 1610, Or. L., provides that an appeal must be taken by service of a notice, in writing, on the clerk of the court where the judgment-roll is filed. Section 1611 provides that a similar notice must be *314 served upon the district attorney for the county in which the judgment-roll is filed. In State v. Berger, 51 Or. 166 (94 Pac. 181), we held that the failure to serve notice upon the clerk rendered an attempted appeal void. The present is a parallel case, and, following our rule in that case, the appeal will be dismissed and judgment affirmed.

(249 Pac. 364.) For appellants Mageske and Hammer there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. W. L. Cooper. For appellants there was a brief over the name of Mr. Grant B. Dimmick. For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Livy S'tipp, District Attorney.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hartfield
624 P.2d 588 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Suttles
588 P.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
State v. Falcone
195 N.W.2d 572 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)
Gowin v. Heider
391 P.2d 630 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)
State v. LeFils
307 P.2d 1048 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1957)
Broom v. Alexander
255 P.2d 1081 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1953)
State v. Dennis
161 P.2d 670 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1945)
State v. Fehl
52 P.2d 1118 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)
State v. Silverman
36 P.2d 342 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1934)
State v. Archerd
24 P.2d 5 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
State v. Berg and McAweeney
4 P.2d 628 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
Fall River Valley Irrigation District v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.
259 P. 444 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
State v. Drury
252 P. 967 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 P. 364, 227 P. 1065, 119 Or. 312, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mageske-or-1926.