State v. Ellis

3 Or. 497
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Wilson, J.

The requisitions of the Code in reference to appeals in criminal, materially differ from those in regard to [498] civil causes. On the part of tlie state, tbe grounds for appeal are limited to two causes. , Notices are to be served differently. No bond in appeal other tban a bail bond is required. The effect of tbe appeal is changed in some respects. And the reasons for dismissal are limited, and nowhere does it require that the notice of appeal' shall contain an assignment of errors. The Legislature evidently intended to provide all necessary regulations in appeals in criminal matters in the enactment of the Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Code; and when a party has complied with all necessary -provisions found there, we think he has a right to be heard here. In order that certainty may be obtained in tbis class of cases, under tbe authority of the statutes, this court will order as a rule, that, after the appealed case is in this court, the appellant shall, if required by respondent, make and file here an assignment of the errors relied upon, within such time as the court may indicate. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ellis, 3 Or. 497 (Or. 1869).

3 Or. 497 (State v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Montgomery
657 P.2d 668 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. A 1963 Corvette Automobile
501 P.2d 330 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1972)
State v. Foster
366 P.2d 896 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)
State v. Garrett
363 P.2d 762 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)
State v. Rosser
91 P.2d 295 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)
State v. Archerd
24 P.2d 5 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
State v. Berger
94 P. 181 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1908)