State v. Bennett

1945 OK CR 102, 162 P.2d 580, 81 Okla. Crim. 222, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 11, 1945
DocketNo. A-10512.
StatusPublished

This text of 1945 OK CR 102 (State v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bennett, 1945 OK CR 102, 162 P.2d 580, 81 Okla. Crim. 222, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233 (Okla. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Henry G. Bennett, was charged with the crime of perjury in Tulsa county. The trial court sustained a motion to quash the indictment, after hearing testimony, and the state appealed.

At the time of the oral argument in this court on December 4, 1944, the state abandoned its appeal in this case, and for this reason the judgment and sentence of the district court of Tulsa county is affirmed. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa County et al., 81 Okla. Cr. 351, 162 P. 2d 561.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.
1945 OK CR 101 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1945 OK CR 102, 162 P.2d 580, 81 Okla. Crim. 222, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bennett-oklacrimapp-1945.