Holmes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Holmes v. State

1911 OK CR 394, 117 P. 656, 6 Okla. Crim. 626, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 345

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1911

DocketNo. A-705.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 394 (Holmes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holmes v. State, 1911 OK CR 394, 117 P. 656, 6 Okla. Crim. 626, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 345 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 4th day of February, 1910, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the county court of Coal county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150 and 60 days confinement in the county jail. An order of the trial court required that appellant should perfect his appeal within 60 days from date of the judgment. There was no extension of time within which this appeal should be perfected. Appellant did not, however, file his appeal in this case until the 6th day of April, 1910, which was after the extension of time within which the court required the appeal to be perfected. This court therefore did not acquire jurisdiction of this case and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 4th day of February, 1910, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the county court of Coal county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150 and 60 days confinement in the county jail. An order of the trial court required that appellant should perfect his appeal within 60 days from date of the judgment. There was no extension of time within which this appeal should be perfected. Appellant did not, however, file his appeal in this case until the 6th day of April, 1910, which was after the extension of time within which the court required the appeal to be perfected. This court therefore did not acquire jurisdiction of this case and the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 394, 117 P. 656, 6 Okla. Crim. 626, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.