Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Baltazar

State v. Baltazar

191 P.3d 761
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 20, 2008
Docket050834800 A131230
StatusPublished

This text of 191 P.3d 761 (State v. Baltazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Baltazar, 191 P.3d 761 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

191 P.3d 761 (2008)
222 Or.App. 93

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Ronald Lee BALTAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

050834800; A131230.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted May 28, 2008.
Decided August 20, 2008.

Anne Fujita Munsey, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.

Jeremy Rice, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and CARSON, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Maiden, 222 Or.App. 9, 191 P.3d 803 (2008); State v. Willis, 219 Or.App. 268, 182 P.3d 891 (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Willis
182 P.3d 891 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Maiden
191 P.3d 803 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Baltazar
191 P.3d 761 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 P.3d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baltazar-orctapp-2008.