Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Baltazar

State v. Baltazar

191 P.3d 761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Baltazar. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 Or. App. 93 →
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 20, 2008·No. 050834800 A131230·Published

Opinion

191 P.3d 761 (2008)
222 Or.App. 93

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Ronald Lee BALTAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

050834800; A131230.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted May 28, 2008.
Decided August 20, 2008.

Anne Fujita Munsey, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.

Jeremy Rice, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and CARSON, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Maiden, 222 Or.App. 9, 191 P.3d 803 (2008); State v. Willis, 219 Or.App. 268, 182 P.3d 891 (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Baltazar, 191 P.3d 761 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

191 P.3d 761 (State v. Baltazar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Willis
182 P.3d 891 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Maiden
191 P.3d 803 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Baltazar
191 P.3d 761 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)