State v. Baldwin
313 S.E.2d 159, 310 N.C. 623
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Roy Cecil BALDWIN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., by Walter M. Smith and G. Criston Windham, Asst. Attys. Gen., Raleigh, for the state.
William C. Gray, Jr., Wilkesboro, for defendant.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Baldwin, 313 S.E.2d 159, 310 N.C. 623 (N.C. 1984).
313 S.E.2d 159 (State v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Steele
689 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Hamad
374 S.E.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
O'NEAL v. Wynn
313 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1984)