Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/O'NEAL v. Wynn

O'NEAL v. Wynn

313 S.E.2d 159, 310 N.C. 621, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1624
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 3, 1984·No. 505A83·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are adequately stated in the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals. After a careful review of the briefs and oral arguments presented in this case, and the majority decision of the Court of Appeals, we have concluded that the rationale and supporting authorities cited in the majority decision constitute a correct statement of the law and a correct application *622 of the law to the facts of this case. Therefore, we agree with the result reached by the majority in the Court of Appeals.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'NEAL v. Wynn, 313 S.E.2d 159, 310 N.C. 621, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1624 (N.C. 1984).

313 S.E.2d 159 (O'NEAL v. Wynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Young
609 S.E.2d 795 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Cook v. Cook
583 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Thomas v. Thomas
518 S.E.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Ellis v. Ellis
485 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
Rawlings v. Rawlings
460 S.E.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1995)
Askew v. Askew
458 S.E.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
Padilla v. Lusth
457 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
Hammill v. Cusack
453 S.E.2d 539 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
McGee v. McGee
453 S.E.2d 531 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
Pittman v. Pittman
443 S.E.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)