State v. Baker
881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 Ohio St. 3d 197 →
Opinion
Summit App. No. 23713. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to appoint counsel nunc pro tunc,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and that Donald Gallick of Lakewood, Ohio, is appointed to represent the appellant in this case, effective as of June 27, 2007.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Baker, 881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2008).
881 N.E.2d 870 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.