State v. Baker

881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 2008
Docket2007-1184
StatusPublished

This text of 881 N.E.2d 870 (State v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Baker, 881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23713. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to appoint counsel nunc pro tunc,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and that Donald Gallick of Lakewood, Ohio, is appointed to represent the appellant in this case, effective as of June 27, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
881 N.E.2d 870, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baker-ohio-2008.