State v. Baker

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Baker

872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1505

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 29, 2007

Docket2007-1184

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 872 N.E.2d 948 (State v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baker, 872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1505 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23713. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed June 27, 2007:

“Must the judgment of conviction contain the defendant’s plea, verdict or findings, and the sentence in one document to constitute a final, appealable order under R.C. 2505.02?”

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Postway, Butler App. No. CA2002-06-154, 2003-Ohio-2689.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 23713. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed June 27, 2007:

“Must the judgment of conviction contain the defendant’s plea, verdict or findings, and the sentence in one document to constitute a final, appealable order under R.C. 2505.02?”

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Postway, Butler App. No. CA2002-06-154, 2003-Ohio-2689.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baker-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack