State v. Baker

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Baker

872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1505

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 29, 2007·No. 2007-1184·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23713. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed June 27, 2007:

“Must the judgment of conviction contain the defendant’s plea, verdict or findings, and the sentence in one document to constitute a final, appealable order under R.C. 2505.02?”

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Postway, Butler App. No. CA2002-06-154, 2003-Ohio-2689.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 23713. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed June 27, 2007:

“Must the judgment of conviction contain the defendant’s plea, verdict or findings, and the sentence in one document to constitute a final, appealable order under R.C. 2505.02?”

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Postway, Butler App. No. CA2002-06-154, 2003-Ohio-2689.

State v. Baker, 872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1505 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

872 N.E.2d 948 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related