State v. Bailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bailey

221 S.W.3d 480, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 713, 2007 WL 1346084

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bailey. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 585 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2007·No. No. ED 88074·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Bailey (“Appellant”) appeals the judgment entered on the jury’s conviction for possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine under section 195.246, RSMo (2000). No [481]*481abuse of discretion by the trial court appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Bailey (“Appellant”) appeals the judgment entered on the jury’s conviction for possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine under section 195.246, RSMo (2000). No [481]*481abuse of discretion by the trial court appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Bailey, 221 S.W.3d 480, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 713, 2007 WL 1346084 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

221 S.W.3d 480 (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.