State v. Bailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bailey

297 S.W.3d 145, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1581, 2009 WL 3754272

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 10, 2009·No. ED 92441·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Bailey appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of possession of a prohibited article in the Missouri Department of Corrections. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Bailey’s motion to suppress and admitting Bailey’s statement regarding ownership of the items found in his cell and in sentencing Bailey as a prior and persistent offender.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Bailey appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of possession of a prohibited article in the Missouri Department of Corrections. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Bailey’s motion to suppress and admitting Bailey’s statement regarding ownership of the items found in his cell and in sentencing Bailey as a prior and persistent offender.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Bailey, 297 S.W.3d 145, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1581, 2009 WL 3754272 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

297 S.W.3d 145 (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related