State v. Anderson

938 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1769
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 18, 1997·No. Nos. 67895, 70120·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant-appellant appeals after sentencing on charges of burglary first degree, forcible rape and robbery second degree. He also appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order af[669]*669firming the judgment. We affirm the convictions, Rule 30.25(b), and denial of Rule 29.15 relief, Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, 938 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 233 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

938 S.W.2d 668 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.