State v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Anderson

938 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 233

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 18, 1997

DocketNos. 67895, 70120

StatusPublished

This text of 938 S.W.2d 668 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anderson, 938 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 233 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant-appellant appeals after sentencing on charges of burglary first degree, forcible rape and robbery second degree. He also appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order af[669]*669firming the judgment. We affirm the convictions, Rule 30.25(b), and denial of Rule 29.15 relief, Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant-appellant appeals after sentencing on charges of burglary first degree, forcible rape and robbery second degree. He also appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order af[669]*669firming the judgment. We affirm the convictions, Rule 30.25(b), and denial of Rule 29.15 relief, Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

938 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-moctapp-1997.