State v. Anderson

919 S.W.2d 282, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 1996·No. Nos. 65704, 68231·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury on two counts of second-degree burglary in violation of § 569.170 RSMo, 1994. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender and as a class X offender to twenty years imprisonment on each of the two counts, to be served concurrently.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error regarding defendant’s conviction to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. However, he did not brief this appeal. Accordingly, defendant has abandoned his 29.15 appeal and that appeal is dismissed. State v. Vinson, 834 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Mo.App.1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, 919 S.W.2d 282, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 559 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

919 S.W.2d 282 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vinson
834 S.W.2d 824 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)