State v. Allen
53 S.W.3d 250, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1388, 2001 WL 939623
Opinion
Order
John Paul Allen appeals his convictions of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. He contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. Having considered his arguments on appeal, we affirm the convictions by summary order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A formal opinion would lack precedential value. A memorandum is furnished to the parties explaining the basis of our decision.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Allen, 53 S.W.3d 250, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1388, 2001 WL 939623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
53 S.W.3d 250 (State v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haas v. State
172 S.W.3d 42 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)