State v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Allen

134 S.W.3d 685, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, 2004 WL 735043

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1205 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 23, 2004·No. No. ED 82414·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Rhonda Allen (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on her conviction of one count of distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (2000). Defendant claims that the trial court erred in overruling her objection to the rebuttal witness of the state.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Rhonda Allen (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on her conviction of one count of distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (2000). Defendant claims that the trial court erred in overruling her objection to the rebuttal witness of the state.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Allen, 134 S.W.3d 685, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, 2004 WL 735043 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

134 S.W.3d 685 (State v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.