State Of Alabama v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
This text of 472 F.2d 1049 (State Of Alabama v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF ALABAMA on the relation of Irvine C. PORTER,
chairman of the Unauthorized practices of law
committee of the Alabama State Bar, and
Irvine C. Porter,
individually,
Plaintiffs-
Appellants,
v.
DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 72-2654. Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 31, 1973.
Marvin Cherner, Frank M. Young, III, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Drayton T. Scott, Drayton Nabers, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This case involves the problem of what is and what is not the practice of law under Title 46, Section 42, Code of Alabama, 1940. We affirm on the basis of the District Court's opinion. State of Alabama on the relation of Irvine C. Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 352 F.Supp. 1226 (N.D.Ala. 1972).
Affirmed.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 F.2d 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-alabama-v-dun-bradstreet-inc-ca5-1973.