Alabama ex rel. Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

472 F.2d 1049
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 1973
DocketNo. 72-2654
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 472 F.2d 1049 (Alabama ex rel. Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabama ex rel. Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 472 F.2d 1049 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case involves the problem of what is and what is not the practice of law under Title 46, Section 42, Code of Alabama, 1940. We affirm on the basis of the District Court’s opinion. State of Alabama on the relation of Irvine C. Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 352 F.Supp. 1226 (N.D.Ala. 1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrews v. Hotel Reed Nursing Home
167 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (S.D. Alabama, 2001)
State Of Alabama v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
472 F.2d 1049 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F.2d 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-ex-rel-porter-v-dun-bradstreet-inc-ca5-1973.