State Highway Department v. Rosenfeld
This text of 164 S.E.2d 259 (State Highway Department v. Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Section 1 of the Act approved April 8, 1968 (Ga. L. 1968, p. 1072) eliminated from the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; Ga. L. 1965, p. 240; Ga. L. 1966, p. 493; Code Ann. § 6-701), Subparagraph (2) of Section 1 (a) which gave the right of appeal “where the decision or judgment complained of, if it had been rendered as claimed for by the appellant, would have been a final disposition of the cause or final as to some material party thereto” and substituted in lieu thereof a new Subparagraph (2) as follows: “Where the trial judge in rendering an order, decision or judgment not otherwise subject to direct appeal, certifies within ten (10) days of entry thereof that such order, decision or judgment is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had.”
The judgment appealed from is one granting a motion for new trial. There being no certificate of the trial judge certifying that the judgment, order or decision is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had, we have no jurisdiction of the appeal and it must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 S.E.2d 259, 118 Ga. App. 524, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-highway-department-v-rosenfeld-gactapp-1968.