State Highway Department v. Rosenfeld

164 S.E.2d 259, 118 Ga. App. 524, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1443
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 1968
Docket43942
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 164 S.E.2d 259 (State Highway Department v. Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Highway Department v. Rosenfeld, 164 S.E.2d 259, 118 Ga. App. 524, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1443 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

Section 1 of the Act approved April 8, 1968 (Ga. L. 1968, p. 1072) eliminated from the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; Ga. L. 1965, p. 240; Ga. L. 1966, p. 493; Code Ann. § 6-701), Subparagraph (2) of Section 1 (a) which gave the right of appeal “where the decision or judgment complained of, if it had been rendered as claimed for by the appellant, would have been a final disposition of the cause or final as to some material party thereto” and substituted in lieu thereof a new Subparagraph (2) as follows: “Where the trial judge in rendering an order, decision or judgment not otherwise subject to direct appeal, certifies within ten (10) days of entry thereof that such order, decision or judgment is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had.”

*525 Argued September 10, 1968 Decided September 25, 1968 Rehearing denied October 15, 1968 Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, As sistant Attorney General, Thurman E. Duncan, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Lennie F. Davis, Harry Dicus, for appellant. Harry C. Jackson, Foley, Chappell, Hollis & Schloth, William J. Schloth, Hatcher, Stubbs, Land & Rothschild, Richard Y. Bradley, for appellees.

The judgment appealed from is one granting a motion for new trial. There being no certificate of the trial judge certifying that the judgment, order or decision is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had, we have no jurisdiction of the appeal and it must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitehead v. Dillard
198 S.E.2d 379 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Pilgreen's Airport, Inc. v. Gold
176 S.E.2d 480 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
State Highway Department v. Rosenfeld
170 S.E.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Selman's Express, Inc. v. Wright
168 S.E.2d 658 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
General Shoe Corp. v. Hood
168 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Hodge v. Dixon
167 S.E.2d 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Cook v. Lumpkin County
166 S.E.2d 921 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Dorsey v. Hood
166 S.E.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E.2d 259, 118 Ga. App. 524, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-highway-department-v-rosenfeld-gactapp-1968.