General Shoe Corp. v. Hood

Court of Appeals of Georgia

General Shoe Corp. v. Hood

168 S.E.2d 326, 119 Ga. App. 648, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1198

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 9, 1969

Docket44420

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 168 S.E.2d 326 (General Shoe Corp. v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Shoe Corp. v. Hood, 168 S.E.2d 326, 119 Ga. App. 648, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1198 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

The appeal in this case is from an order of the court overruling and dismissing a plea of res judicata. This is not such an order, judgment or ruling from which an appeal may be taken, as the case was left pending in the court below and there is no certificate in the record by the trial judge certifying the matter to be of such importance that immediate review should be had. State Hwy. Dept. v. Bosenfeld, 118 Ga. App. 524 (164 SE2d 259); Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, as amended by Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073 (Code Ann. [649]*649§ 6-701 (a)). Section 1 of the amendment of 1968 eliminated from Section 1 (a) (3) of the Appellate Practice Act the right to appeal directly “from all judgments or orders sustaining, overruling or dismissing pleas to the jurisdiction or pleas in bar” in the absence of a certificate of the trial judge as required by Section 1 (a) (2) of the Appellate Practice Act as amended by the Act of 1968.

Submitted April 7, 1969 Decided May 9, 1969. B. T. Spencer, Henry G. Smith, Jr., for appellant. Jones, Cork, Miller & Benton, Wallace Miller, Jr., for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pannell, Judge.

The appeal in this case is from an order of the court overruling and dismissing a plea of res judicata. This is not such an order, judgment or ruling from which an appeal may be taken, as the case was left pending in the court below and there is no certificate in the record by the trial judge certifying the matter to be of such importance that immediate review should be had. State Hwy. Dept. v. Bosenfeld, 118 Ga. App. 524 (164 SE2d 259); Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, as amended by Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073 (Code Ann. [649]*649§ 6-701 (a)). Section 1 of the amendment of 1968 eliminated from Section 1 (a) (3) of the Appellate Practice Act the right to appeal directly “from all judgments or orders sustaining, overruling or dismissing pleas to the jurisdiction or pleas in bar” in the absence of a certificate of the trial judge as required by Section 1 (a) (2) of the Appellate Practice Act as amended by the Act of 1968.

Submitted April 7, 1969 Decided May 9, 1969. B. T. Spencer, Henry G. Smith, Jr., for appellant. Jones, Cork, Miller & Benton, Wallace Miller, Jr., for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E.2d 326, 119 Ga. App. 648, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-shoe-corp-v-hood-gactapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack