Whitehead v. Dillard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Whitehead v. Dillard

198 S.E.2d 379, 129 Ga. App. 5, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 853

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 25, 1973

Docket48017

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 198 S.E.2d 379 (Whitehead v. Dillard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitehead v. Dillard, 198 S.E.2d 379, 129 Ga. App. 5, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 853 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, Judge.

Where a motion for a new trial is sustained, such ruling is not a final disposition of the case. Accordingly it is not appealable without a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073); State Hwy. Dept. v. Rosenfeld, 118 Ga. App. 524 (164 SE2d 259); Pilgreen’s Airport, Inc. v. Gold, 122 Ga. App. 194 (176 SE2d 480). See also Fife v. Johnston, 225 Ga. 447 (169 SE2d 167) where our Supreme Court recognized that "Cruel though it was for the law to thus authorize a judge to deprive the loser of a right to appeal, we can not say the law is unconstitutional.”

In the instant case the trial judge granted a new trial to defendant following a plaintiffs verdict upon the special ground that he had erred in denying defendant’s motion for mistrial based on improper statements in the closing argument of plaintiffs attorney. As this was not a new trial granted on the discretionary general grounds, it was appealable, provided appellant had obtained a certificate of immediate review. Rice v. Matthews, 104 Ga. App. 593 (1) (122 SE2d 175); Southern States, Inc. v. Thomason, 128 Ga. App. 667. The record here containing no requisite certificate, our court is without jurisdiction and the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

Hall, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, Judge.

Where a motion for a new trial is sustained, such ruling is not a final disposition of the case. Accordingly it is not appealable without a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073); State Hwy. Dept. v. Rosenfeld, 118 Ga. App. 524 (164 SE2d 259); Pilgreen’s Airport, Inc. v. Gold, 122 Ga. App. 194 (176 SE2d 480). See also Fife v. Johnston, 225 Ga. 447 (169 SE2d 167) where our Supreme Court recognized that "Cruel though it was for the law to thus authorize a judge to deprive the loser of a right to appeal, we can not say the law is unconstitutional.”

In the instant case the trial judge granted a new trial to defendant following a plaintiffs verdict upon the special ground that he had erred in denying defendant’s motion for mistrial based on improper statements in the closing argument of plaintiffs attorney. As this was not a new trial granted on the discretionary general grounds, it was appealable, provided appellant had obtained a certificate of immediate review. Rice v. Matthews, 104 Ga. App. 593 (1) (122 SE2d 175); Southern States, Inc. v. Thomason, 128 Ga. App. 667. The record here containing no requisite certificate, our court is without jurisdiction and the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

Hall, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 S.E.2d 379, 129 Ga. App. 5, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-dillard-gactapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack