State Farm Florida Ins. Co. v. Gallmon

835 So. 2d 389, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 2003 WL 193544
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 2003
Docket2D02-3439
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 835 So. 2d 389 (State Farm Florida Ins. Co. v. Gallmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Florida Ins. Co. v. Gallmon, 835 So. 2d 389, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 2003 WL 193544 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

835 So.2d 389 (2003)

STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
Isaac GALLMON, Respondent.

No. 2D02-3439.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 29, 2003.

*390 Elizabeth K. Russo, Jude Gillespie, and Charmain Williams of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner.

William F. Merlin, Jr. and Kelly L. Kubiak of Gunn Merlin, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.

CASANUEVA, Judge.

State Farm Florida Insurance Co. petitions for a writ of certiorari to quash an interlocutory order requiring it to disclose certain internal operating materials and various other items. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 9.030(b)(2)(A) and grant the petition.

Isaac Gallmon has a homeowner's insurance policy issued by State Farm. Mr. Gallmon's residence began to show signs of damage that he thought might be attributable to a sinkhole. State Farm's experts investigated and determined that the damage was probably due to a sinkhole and to the loose, sandy soil condition under Mr. Gallmon's home. Pursuant to the policy, State Farm offered to pay for repairs for the damage attributable to the sinkhole and for a process known as "grouting," which retards sinkhole activity. Mr. Gallmon was unhappy with that offer and claimed that because the repair would not guarantee against further damage, State Farm should offer the full policy limits. When State Farm refused to pay for anything more than its original damage offer and the grouting procedure, Mr. Gallmon instituted this first-party breach of contract action against State Farm.

During discovery, the circuit court issued a wide-ranging order to State Farm to produce its claim files, investigative reports, adjuster notes, underwriting files, company policies and manuals, training materials, certain personnel files, sales brochures and marketing materials, computer manuals for operating internal software and programs, details of rewards and bonus programs for employees, employee incentive and compensation programs, third-party programs and correspondence about sinkhole claims, its casualty claims manual and estimating manual, and minutes of meetings at which sinkhole claims were discussed. We quash the order in its entirety.

These materials are either irrelevant to the first-party dispute that this case presents or are privileged work product. See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Valido, 662 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and cases cited therein.

Certiorari granted.

FULMER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Premier Diagnostic Centers, LLC, Etc.
185 So. 3d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
General Star Indemnity Co. v. Atlantic Hospitality of Florida, LLC
93 So. 3d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. M.E.S., Inc.
289 F.R.D. 41 (E.D. New York, 2011)
GRANADA INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ricks
12 So. 3d 276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Lloyd's Underwriters at London v. El-Ad Villagio Condominium Association, Inc.
976 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 So. 2d 389, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 2003 WL 193544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-florida-ins-co-v-gallmon-fladistctapp-2003.