State ex rel. Wilson v. McGee

2009 Ohio 5261, 916 N.E.2d 480, 123 Ohio St. 3d 341
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 8, 2009·No. 2009-1038·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Lawrence E. Wilson, for a writ of mandamus to correct his sentence. The common pleas court was authorized under Crim.R. 36 to correct its clerical error in mistakenly characterizing the degree of the offense of which Wilson was convicted. See State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski, 111 Ohio St.3d 353, 2006-Ohio-5795, 856 N.E.2d 263, ¶ 19. Moreover, Wilson had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claim of noncompliance with Crim.R. 32. Id. at ¶ 32. Finally, Wilson waived this claim on appeal by failing to raise it in his petition in the court of *342 appeals and by not seeking to amend his petition. See State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford, 100 Ohio St.3d 113, 2003-Ohio-5101, 796 N.E.2d 929, ¶ 32.

Lawrence E. Wilson, pro se. Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and John A. Cumming, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Wilson v. McGee, 2009 Ohio 5261, 916 N.E.2d 480, 123 Ohio St. 3d 341 (Ohio 2009).

2009 Ohio 5261 (State ex rel. Wilson v. McGee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford
100 Ohio St. 3d 113 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski
856 N.E.2d 263 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)