State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski

109 Ohio St. 3d 1489
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 2006
Docket2006-1007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file his brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file his brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rutherford, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2006)
2006 Ohio 5132 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 Ohio St. 3d 1489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cruzado-v-zaleski-ohio-2006.