State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford

791 N.E.2d 977, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1460

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 14, 2003

Docket2003-0528

StatusPublished

This text of 791 N.E.2d 977 (State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford, 791 N.E.2d 977, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 02AP-99, 2003-Ohio-625. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On July 10, 2003, appellant filed a request for extension of time to file a reply brief that was due July 8, 2003. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(IXC) prohibits untimely filings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the request for extension of time to file a reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 02AP-99, 2003-Ohio-625. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On July 10, 2003, appellant filed a request for extension of time to file a reply brief that was due July 8, 2003. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(IXC) prohibits untimely filings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the request for extension of time to file a reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

791 N.E.2d 977, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rw-sidley-inc-v-crawford-ohio-2003.