State, Ex Rel. v. Broward County Port Authority

151 So. 416, 118 Fla. 42
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 151 So. 416 (State, Ex Rel. v. Broward County Port Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, Ex Rel. v. Broward County Port Authority, 151 So. 416, 118 Fla. 42 (Fla. 1933).

Opinions

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 44 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 45 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 46 On June 14, 1932, an amended alternative writ of mandamus was filed herein containing a command that the respondents, as and constituting the Broward County Port Authority, forthwith, and without undue delay, pay over to the relator the sum of $1261.00 alleged to be held in respondents' custody and as such to be applicable and available to be paid over to relator upon certain indebtedness held by him in the form of City of Hollywood bonds which it is alleged the Broward County Port Authority had lawfully assumed and agreed to pay pursuant to competent statutory authority so to do. The writ, as amended, sets up a total alleged indebtedness claimed by relator amounting to $23,220.00. To apply on this claim, the writ asserts that there is on hand and available for payment in part satisfaction thereof, the sum of $1,261.00 in moneys raised and collected from taxation by said Broward County Port District to be applied to the district indebtedness, of which relator's claim is asserted to be a part.

The case is now before us for consideration upon respondents' demurrer to the amended writ of mandamus, as *Page 47 well as upon relator's motion for a peremptory writ notwithstanding a special return filed by respondents setting up certain special defenses. In addition to the foregoing, there was received and permitted to be tentatively filed in this proceeding, a petition of the City of Hollywood praying that it be made a party respondent. Said petition was accompanied by an answer prepared in its behalf. The City of Hollywood's answer was likewise ordered to be received and filed for consideration as a part of the pleadings herein, subject to its being stricken out later should it be found on final hearing to be inapplicable, or such an intervention as ought not to be allowed to stand as part of the record in the present case.

It is accordingly disclosed by the record that in 1926 the City of Hollywood, purporting to act under its charter (Chapter 11510, Special Acts of 1925), issued bonds in the sum of $2,000,000.00 of which relator's bonds are a part.

The bonds so issued recited that they were issued for unspecified municipal purposes of the City of Hollywood, Florida, under and pursuant to and in strict compliance with the Constitution and statutes of the State of Florida and under and pursuant to proceedings duly adopted and taken by the City Commission of the City of Hollywood, Florida, all as required by law. It is further recited that the bonds were regularly and duly validated by decree of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida on November 5, 1926. Recited also in such bonds, is the 1925 Charter Act of the City of Hollywood (Chapter 11519, supra) as the authority for their issue. Due execution of the bonds under the hand of the Mayor, attested by the signatures of the City Treasurer and of the City Auditor, under the city's seal, is made to appear by a copy of one of the bonds under consideration which is attached as an *Page 48 exhibit and made a part of the amended alternative writ.

In 1927, by Chapter 12562, Special Acts of 1927, a Port District in Broward County was created. Acting under authority of this Act the Port Authority as part of the plan of its creation, took over a certain pending harbor project from the City of Hollywood and the City of Fort Lauderdale, which municipalities had together been projecting the same on their own credit and responsibility. Incident to this transaction, the Port Authority acquired from the two municipalities the balance of the proceeds of their bonds to the extent that such proceeds had not been expended on said harbor project, and agreed to repay the City of Hollywood and the City of Fort Lauderdale not only what they had expended, but also to pay the cities the amounts of the bond interest and maturities as they should become due.

In 1929, by Chapter 13940, Special Acts of that year, the Port District was authorized by resolution to assume payment of the municipal bonds in question and to become primarily liable thereon. Under authority of the 1929 Act an assumption agreement was entered into, and by a subsequent legislative Act (Chapter 15107, Special Acts of 1931), the Act creating the original Port District, set up in 1927, was repealed and a new District of like character created to take its place.

Section 5 of said Chapter 15107, Special Acts of 1931, specifically undertook to validate the prior assumption and enacted that the bonds of the cities of Hollywood and of Fort Lauderdale so assumed, should be the valid and binding obligation of the Port District created by the Act of 1931.

So the real question presented by the pleadings considered as a whole, is whether or not Chapter 15107, Special Acts of 1931, if a valid Act is sufficient to sustain and render enforceable against the Broward County Port District created *Page 49 in 1931, the assumed bonds of the municipality, of which relator shows himself to be a holder.

The City of Hollywood was recognized under Chapter 12877, Special Acts, 1927, which abolished the old municipality and established a new municipality to be known as the City of Hollywood. The new municipality succeeded to all the property and property rights of the abolished corporation and became bound for its obligations, contracts and undertakings.

The Broward County Port District, as originally created, was organized under Chapter 12652, Special Acts, 1927. As laid out, it included both the cities of Hollywood and Fort Lauderdale, together with outside territory twelve to fifteen miles wide, extending westerly to the western county line of Broward County. The purpose of the creation of the new Port District appears to have been to establish in a described territory deemed to be benefited thereby, a new special taxing district, to be governed by a special Port Authority, which could and would take over, manage and operate for the general utility and benefit of the enlarged territory comprised in the Port District, the special Port improvements theretofore being projected solely as municipal works of the Cities of Hollywood and Fort Lauderdale, and in consideration thereof, to take over and assume, and agree to pay, the municipal debts that the cities of Fort Lauderdale and Hollywood had incurred up to that time in executing and bringing about the harbor improvements which the Act contemplated would be transferred in their entirety to, and become the assets of, the Broward County Port District. The enactment of Chapter 15107, Special Acts, 1931, merely validated and carried forward under a new organization, the original district established in 1927, *Page 50 accompanied by an express validation of all the acts and proceedings previously had by the pre-existing district.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webster v. North Orange Memorial Hosp. Tax Dist.
187 So. 2d 37 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Fugate v. Mayor and City Council of Town of Buffalo
348 P.2d 76 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1960)
Adams v. Saunders
191 So. 312 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Olds v. Alvord
183 So. 711 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
City of Fort Lauderdale v. State Ex Rel. Elston Bank & Trust Co.
169 So. 584 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Martha Bright Farms, Inc. v. Broward County Port Authority
158 So. 70 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 So. 416, 118 Fla. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-v-broward-county-port-authority-fla-1933.