Stewart v. Daytona & New Smyrna Inlet District

114 So. 545, 94 Fla. 859
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 114 So. 545 (Stewart v. Daytona & New Smyrna Inlet District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Daytona & New Smyrna Inlet District, 114 So. 545, 94 Fla. 859 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

In a proceeding brought under the statute to validate $1,500,000.00 of 6% bonds, proposed to be issued by the Daytona and New Smyrna Inlet District the Circuit Judge decreed that “the bonds referred to and described in said petition and answer and the other papers filed herein, are hereby, validated and confirmed,” without stating the amount, maturities and other features of the bonds. An intervener appealed as allowed by the statute. Sec. 3298, Revised General Statutes.

Chapter 11,791, Acts of 1925, Extraordinary Session, contains the following:

Section 1. That a Special Taxing District is hereby created to be known as Daytona 'and New Smyrna Inlet District, to consist of and embrace all that territory in Volusia County, Florida, which is now embraced within the territorial boundaries of County Commissioner’s District No. 4, and all that territory in Volusia County, Florida, which is now embraced within the territorial boundaries of County Commissioner’s District No. 5.

Section 2. That a governing body of said Daytona and New Smyrna Inlet District is hereby created and shall be *861 known as and designated as the Board of Commissioners of Daytona and New Smyrna Inlet District and shall be composed of three members, one of whom shall reside within the territorial limits of County Commissioner ’s .District No. 5, and one of which shall reside within the territorial limits of County Commissioner’s District No. 4, and one of whom may reside within either of the aforesaid county commissioner’s districts, but must reside within the Inlet District hereby created, and such commissioners shall be elected as is provided in this Act. Said governing body shall have all powers of a body corporate, including the power to sue and be sued as a corporation in its name and in any court having jurisdiction; to make contracts, to adopt and use a common seal, and to alter the same if deemed expedient and to buy, sell, own, lease, sell and convey such real estate and personal property as said Board may deem proper to carry out the provisions of this Act; to appoint and employ such engineers and such agents and employees as said Board may require; to borrow money and to issue negotiable promissory notes, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness therefor to enable them to carry out the provisions of this Act.

Section 5. That said Board is hereby authorized and empowered to improve, or construct and thereafter maintain an inlet or waterway connecting the waters of Indian River and Halifax River with the waters of the Atlantic Ocean at or near Mosquito Inlet within said district, and do all acts or things proper, necessary or convenient for that purpose and in that connection. That the opening, cutting, improving, and maintaining said inlet or waterway is hereby found and declared to be necessary for the maintenance of the health of the inhabitants of the territory embraced in said district and for the convenience, *862 comfort and welfare of said district and the inhabitants thereof.

Section 6. Said Board is hereby authorized and empowered to clean, cut, straighten, widen, change course of, or deepen any watercourse, or natural stream or body of water in said district that may be deemed necessary by said Board to facilitate the opening and maintenance of a canal, inlet or waterway between said Indian River and Halifax River and said Atlantic Ocean within said district, and to construct and maintain canals, ditches, levees, revetments, jetties, and other works and improvements deemed by said Board to be necessary to construct, preserve and maintain the works in said district; to any bridge or roadway, over levees, embankments, highways, railroads, or over any canal or waterway constructed by said Board under this Act.

Section 7. That said Board shall have the power and authority to hold, control and acquire by gift or purchase, for the use of the district, any real or personal property, and to condemn any lands, easements, railroad right-of-way in or out of said district for a right-of-way for any canal, inlet, ditch, waterway or work constructed or to be constructed by said Board under this Act, or for the material to be used therein or for the maintenance and preservation of the works and improvements constructed or to be constructed by said Board under this Act. That said Board is authorized and empowered to exercise the right of eminent doman and may condemn for the use of said district, in the manner prescribed by law, any and all lands, easements, right-of-way, riparian rights and real and personal property of every description required for the purposes and powers of said Board as granted by this Act.

Section 8. That said Board is hereby authorized and *863 empowered to levy upon all of the real and personal- taxable property in said district a special tax for the year 1926, and for each and every year thereafter, to be used solely for the purpose authorized and prescribed by this Act. Said levy shall be made each year, not later than the first day of June of each such year by resolution of said Board or a majority thereof, duly entered at large upon its minutes. Certified copies o'f such resolution executed in the name of said Board by its chairman and secretary and under its corporate seal shall be made and delivered to the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County and to the Comptroller of the State of Florida, not later than the 15th day of June of each and every year thereafter. It shall be the duty of the Commissioners of Volusia County, Florida, to order the assessor of said county to assess and the collector of said county to collect the amount of taxes so assessed by said Board of Commissioners of Daytona and New Smyrna Inlet District upon all of the taxable property, both real and personal, in said district at the rate of taxation adopted by said Board for said year, and included in said resolution and said levy shall be included in the warrant of the tax assessor and attached to the assessment roll of taxes for said county each year. The tax collector shall collect such tax so levied by said Board in the same manner as other taxes are collected, and shall pay the same within the time and in the manner prescribed by law to the treasurer of said Board. It shall be the duty of said Comptroller to assess and levy, on all the railroad lines and railroad property and telegraph lines and telegraph property situated in said district, including as well all telephone lines and telephone property, the amount of each such levy as in ease of other State and county taxes, and to collect the said taxes thereon in the same manner as he is required by law to assess *864 and 'collect taxes for State and county purposes, and to remit the same to the treasurer of said Board. All such taxes shall be held by said treasurer for the credit of said Board and paid out by him as provided herein.

Section 9. That said Board is hereby authorized and empowered in order to provide for the work prescribed by this Act, to borrow money in sum not to exceed $25,000.00 temporarily from time to time for periods ■ of time not exceeding two years at any one time, and to issue promissory notes therefor upon such terms and at such rates of interest, not exceeding eight per cent per annum, as said Board may deem advisable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joe Hatton, Inc. v. Conner
240 So. 2d 145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Conner v. Joe Hatton, Inc.
203 So. 2d 154 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Stoudenmire v. West Volusia Hospital Authority
113 So. 2d 225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Golden v. Gray
9 Fla. Supp. 17 (Leon County Circuit Court, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Arthur Kudner, Inc. v. Lee
7 So. 2d 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & Son
181 So. 153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Esch v. Forster
168 So. 229 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Loftus
156 So. 341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Forster v. Esch
152 So. 444 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
State, Ex Rel. v. Broward County Port Authority
151 So. 416 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Herbert v. Thursby
151 So. 385 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
New Smyrna Inlet District v. Esch
138 So. 49 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Whitney v. Hillsborough County
127 So. 486 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Smith Bros. Inc. v. Williams
126 So. 367 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Merriman v. Hutchinson
116 So. 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 545, 94 Fla. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-daytona-new-smyrna-inlet-district-fla-1927.