State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. State

765 N.E.2d 367, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 790

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 2002

Docket01- 748

StatusPublished

This text of 765 N.E.2d 367 (State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. State, 765 N.E.2d 367, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 790 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 98AP-1015.

This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County and has been consolidated with Supreme Court case No. 01-976, State ex reí R.T.G., Inc. v. State. In order to provide for an orderly structure of the oral argument of the consolidated cases,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the parties shall follow the structure of argument for a case involving a cross-appeal. Appellants/eross-appellees shall open the argument and both appellants/cross-appellees and appellees/cross-appellants shall have rebuttal time. The parties shall consolidate any argument related to case No. 01-976 within this structure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 98AP-1015.

This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County and has been consolidated with Supreme Court case No. 01-976, State ex reí R.T.G., Inc. v. State. In order to provide for an orderly structure of the oral argument of the consolidated cases,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the parties shall follow the structure of argument for a case involving a cross-appeal. Appellants/eross-appellees shall open the argument and both appellants/cross-appellees and appellees/cross-appellants shall have rebuttal time. The parties shall consolidate any argument related to case No. 01-976 within this structure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 N.E.2d 367, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rtg-inc-v-state-ohio-2002.