State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Floyd

847 N.E.2d 1221, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1474
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 19, 2006
Docket2006-0945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 847 N.E.2d 1221 (State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Floyd, 847 N.E.2d 1221, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1474 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file its brief within 10 days after the filing of evidence; respondents shall file their brief , within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents brief.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Floyd
111 Ohio St. 3d 56 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 N.E.2d 1221, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-plain-dealer-publishing-co-v-floyd-ohio-2006.