State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner

938 N.E.2d 367, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1466
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 2010
Docket2010-2205
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 938 N.E.2d 367 (State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner, 938 N.E.2d 367, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1466 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon further review, it is ordered that this ease shall proceed as an original action that does not involve a pending election and shall instead proceed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.5. The Clerk of this court shall issue a summons [1467]*1467pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.4 and serve a copy of the complaint on respondents, and the respondents shall file a response to the complaint within 21 days of the date of service of the summons.

It is further ordered that the respondents shall file a response to the motion for expedited issuance of an alternative writ and motion for an order for temporary injunctive relief no later than Monday, December 27, 2010, at 10 a.m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner
2011 Ohio 35 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 N.E.2d 367, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-painter-v-brunner-ohio-2010.