State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner

938 N.E.2d 367, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1466
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 2010·No. 2010-2205·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon further review, it is ordered that this ease shall proceed as an original action that does not involve a pending election and shall instead proceed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.5. The Clerk of this court shall issue a summons [1467]*1467pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.4 and serve a copy of the complaint on respondents, and the respondents shall file a response to the complaint within 21 days of the date of service of the summons.

It is further ordered that the respondents shall file a response to the motion for expedited issuance of an alternative writ and motion for an order for temporary injunctive relief no later than Monday, December 27, 2010, at 10 a.m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner, 938 N.E.2d 367, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1466 (Ohio 2010).

938 N.E.2d 367 (State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Painter v. Brunner
2011 Ohio 35 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)