State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Myers

1967 OK 44, 424 P.2d 975, 1967 Okla. LEXIS 360
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 14, 1967
DocketS. C. B. D. 2075
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 1967 OK 44 (State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Myers, 1967 OK 44, 424 P.2d 975, 1967 Okla. LEXIS 360 (Okla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A complaint was duly filed by the Oklahoma Bar Association charging the respondent in two counts of violating the Canons of Professional Ethics and with unprofessional conduct.

The trial was conducted by the trial examiner in March of 1966. The respondent was present in person and by his attorney. Thereafter the trial examiner made his report and recommendations to the Executive Council of the Oklahoma Bar Association. The trial examiner recommended that Ralph A. Myers, Jr., respondent herein, be disbarred from the practice of law in this State, and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys. The matter is now before this court for study and review.

We have reviewed the evidence and all proceedings and examined each charge and have entered herein the order which we deem fitting and proper.

The charges are as -follows:

“COUNT I. That the Respondent, Ralph A. Myers, Jr., did on the 14th day of September, 1962, while acting in his capacity as Administrator of the estate of Florence M. Waller, Deceased, Case No. 4328 in the County Court of Canadian County, State of Oklahoma, present to one Ozella Tarver, Deputy Court Clerk of Canadian County, State of Oklahoma, for filing in the above numbered and entitled case, an instrument which the Respondent represented to the above named Deputy Court Clerk to be a copy of an Order signed by Virgil M. Shaw, Judge of the County Court in which said estate was pending. That said Order purported to empower the said Respondent in his capacity as an Administrator of the estate of Florence M. Waller, Deceased, to incumber certain property of the said estate by borrowing such sums as were necessary for the benefit of said estate. That in truth and in fact, the said Virgil M. Shaw, Judge of the County Court of Canadian County, had not been presented with an application for the purposes in said Order mentioned and had not placed his signature upon said Order as represented by Respondent to the Deputy Court Clerk. That by his actions as hereinabove set out, the Respondent did cause to be filed in the records of the Court Clerk of Canadian County a false and spurious instrument.”
“COUNT II. That the said Ralph A. Myers, Jr., did, over a period of time, beginning on or about the 22nd day of December, 1959, and ending on or about *977 the 19th day of March, 1965, while acting in his capacity as an attorney at law and Administrator of the estate of Florence M. Waller, Deceased, Case No. 4328 in the County Court of Canadian County, State of Oklahoma, co-mingle the funds of the said estate with funds of his own and did fail to account properly for said funds of the estate of the said Florence M. Waller, Deceased, but did convert a part of the said funds to his own use and benefit.”

The evidence on behalf of the complainant was by stipulation by and between the complainant and respondent with the agreement that the facts as stipulated were true and correct. The pertinent parts of the stipulation are as follows:

“I. Ralph A. Myers, Jr., was appointed administrator of the estate of Florence M. Waller, deceased, Case No. 4328 in the County Court of Canadian County, State of Oklahoma, on the 22nd day of December, 1959, and occupied that position at all times hereinafter referred to.
******
“III. While acting as administrator of the Waller estate and as attorney for the Waller estate, Ralph A. Myers, Jr. did cause monies of the Waller estate and his personal monies to be commingled in his personal checking account in the First National Bank of El Reno, Oklahoma. Specifically, checks payable to and belonging to the Waller estate were deposited to Ralph Myers, Jr/s personal account.
“IV. No accounting was made in the Waller estate by Ralph Myers, Jr. until the 8th day of November, 1965.
“V. On the 14th day of September, 1962, Ralph Myers, Jr., acting as administrator of and attorney for the Waller estate presented to Ozella Tarver, Deputy Court Clerk of Canadian County, State of Oklahoma, a copy of an ‘Order’ purportedly signed by Virgil M. Shaw, Judge of the County Court of Canadian County, State of Oklahoma. The ‘Order’ is attached hereto, marked ‘Exhibit No. 1’ and made a part hereof. At Ralph Myers, Jr.’s request, the Order, Exhibit 1, was certified by Ozella Tarver acting as the Deputy Court Clerk and returned to Ralph Myers, Jr.
“VI. Judge Shaw, if present to testify, would state that he did not sign the ‘Order’, Exhibit 1, and it was at no time presented to him for his approval or signature.
“VII. The files of the County Court Court Clerk of Canadian County do not show that the ‘Order’, Exhibit 1, was ever filed in the case. No other Order of the County Court of Canadian County was filed authorizing the encumbrancing of estate property hereinafter referred to.
“VIII. On the 14th day of September, 1962, Ralph A. Myers, Jr. presented the Order, Exhibit 1, and a Title Opinion marked ‘Exhibit No. 2’, attached hereto and made a part hereof, to M. S. Morris of the First National Bank of El Reno, Oklahoma, as authority to encumber and borrow on certain Waller estate real estate.
“IX. On the 14th day of September, 1962, based on the Order, Exhibit 1, and the Title Opinion, Exhibit 2, the First National Bank of Yukon (sic) El Reno, did cause $6,000 to be deposited in the account of ‘Ralph Myers, administrator of the Florence Waller Estate’. Ralph Myers, Jr., signed a note for $6,000 marked ‘Exhibit 3’, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and a mortgage on certain Waller estate real estate, marked ‘Exhibit 4’, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
“X. On the 14th day of September, 1962, prior to the $6,000 deposit above referred to, the Waller estate bank account had a balance of less than $10.
“XI. On the 14th day of September, 1962, Ralph Myers, Jr. wrote the following checks on the Waller estate checking *978 account, which were cased on that same date:
“PAYEE AMOUNT
“1. Ralph Myers, Jr. $ 600.00
2. Mary Waller 250.00
3. Garner Pettygrew 2,054.00
4. First National Bank of El 268.67 Reno Oklahoma, to pay the ■ balance on Ralph Myers, Jr. personal note in the amount of $750.
“XII. On the 12th day of March, 1965, Ralph Myers, Jr. applied to the County Court of Canadian County for a nunc pro tunc order, a copy of the application attached hereto and made a part hereof and marked 'Exhibit 5’, to permit Ralph Myers, Jr. to encumber the estate in the amount of $6,000, the act having been previously accomplished by Ralph Myers, Jr. as hereinbefore set out. The application was denied by the Court.”

The order above referred to as Exhibit 1, purportedly signed by the County Judge authorized the respondent to encumber certain real estate belonging to said estate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Arnold
2003 OK 31 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2003)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bradley
1987 OK 78 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Moore
1987 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hensley
1977 OK 23 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1977)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bishop
1976 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1976)
Application of Sharpe
1972 OK 92 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1967 OK 44, 424 P.2d 975, 1967 Okla. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-oklahoma-bar-assn-v-myers-okla-1967.