State ex rel. Nix v. Cleveland

689 N.E.2d 570, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 583
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1998
Docket98-68
StatusPublished

This text of 689 N.E.2d 570 (State ex rel. Nix v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Nix v. Cleveland, 689 N.E.2d 570, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 583 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On January 26, 1998, respondents filed a motion to quash and for protective order. In appearing to the court that the date of the deposition that is the subject of the motion has passed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the respondents show cause no later than noon on February 4, 1998, why the motion to quash and for protective order should not be denied as moot. Respondents may file their response by facsimile transmission in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(B)(2), (1)(B)(3), and (1)(B)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 N.E.2d 570, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nix-v-cleveland-ohio-1998.