State, Ex Rel. Moore v. Smith, Sheriff

Ohio Court of Appeals

State, Ex Rel. Moore v. Smith, Sheriff

85 N.E.2d 608, 84 Ohio App. 93, 39 Ohio Op. 117, 1948 Ohio App. LEXIS 642

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 18, 1948

Docket1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 N.E.2d 608 (State, Ex Rel. Moore v. Smith, Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, Ex Rel. Moore v. Smith, Sheriff, 85 N.E.2d 608, 84 Ohio App. 93, 39 Ohio Op. 117, 1948 Ohio App. LEXIS 642 (Ohio Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule VII of the Courts of Appeals.

Where the appellant has failed to file a bill of exceptions, assignments of error and brief within 50 days after filing of notice of intention to appeal on questions of law, a motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained. Section 12223-21, General Code; Anderson v. Indus. Comm., 135 Ohio St., 77, 19 N. E. (2d), 509; Parrett v. Parrett, 42 Ohio Law Abs., 413, 60 N. E. (2d), 736; Lair v. Lair, 33 Ohio Law Abs., 544, 35 N. E. (2d), 850; Tucker v. Fergus, 30 Ohio Law Abs., 508; Fulkerson v. Roxanna Canning Co., 26 Ohio Law Abs., 607.

The motion ix> dismiss the appeal will be sustained.

Motion sustained.

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule VII of the Courts of Appeals.

Where the appellant has failed to file a bill of exceptions, assignments of error and brief within 50 days after filing of notice of intention to appeal on questions of law, a motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained. Section 12223-21, General Code; Anderson v. Indus. Comm., 135 Ohio St., 77, 19 N. E. (2d), 509; Parrett v. Parrett, 42 Ohio Law Abs., 413, 60 N. E. (2d), 736; Lair v. Lair, 33 Ohio Law Abs., 544, 35 N. E. (2d), 850; Tucker v. Fergus, 30 Ohio Law Abs., 508; Fulkerson v. Roxanna Canning Co., 26 Ohio Law Abs., 607.

The motion ix> dismiss the appeal will be sustained.

Motion sustained.

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 N.E.2d 608, 84 Ohio App. 93, 39 Ohio Op. 117, 1948 Ohio App. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-moore-v-smith-sheriff-ohioctapp-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack