Lair v. Lair

35 N.E.2d 850, 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 544
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 1941
DocketNo 3309
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 N.E.2d 850 (Lair v. Lair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lair v. Lair, 35 N.E.2d 850, 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 544 (Ohio Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of plaintiffappellee to dismiss the appeal,

(1) For failure of appellant to file brief within fifty days after his notice of appeal was filed.

(2) For failure to file motion for extension of time within which to file briefs.

Both of these grounds of the motion are well taken and it must therefore be sustained.

We have an application of date January 4, 1941, of counsel for defendant-appellant for leave to file the briefs out of rule, but the reasons assigned therefor are not sufficient to support the order sought.

We have, without exception, enforced Rule VII when counsel have invoked it by motion, and no sufficient reason appears in this case to justify an exception to the rule.

The motion will be sustained.

HORÑBECK, PJ., GEIGER & BARNES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State, Ex Rel. Moore v. Smith, Sheriff
85 N.E.2d 608 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)
State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. Moore
82 N.E.2d 323 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 N.E.2d 850, 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lair-v-lair-ohioctapp-1941.