Lair v. Lair
This text of 35 N.E.2d 850 (Lair v. Lair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Submitted on motion of plaintiffappellee to dismiss the appeal,
(1) For failure of appellant to file brief within fifty days after his notice of appeal was filed.
(2) For failure to file motion for extension of time within which to file briefs.
Both of these grounds of the motion are well taken and it must therefore be sustained.
We have an application of date January 4, 1941, of counsel for defendant-appellant for leave to file the briefs out of rule, but the reasons assigned therefor are not sufficient to support the order sought.
We have, without exception, enforced Rule VII when counsel have invoked it by motion, and no sufficient reason appears in this case to justify an exception to the rule.
The motion will be sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 N.E.2d 850, 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lair-v-lair-ohioctapp-1941.