Tucker v. Fergus
30 Ohio Law. Abs. 508, 1939 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 884
Opinion
OPINION
The above entitled cause is now being determined on defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff-appellant’s appeal on the grounds that she has not complied with Rule VII of this Court, not having filed her assignments of error and brief within fifty days of the filing of her notice of intention to appeal.
Motion sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tucker v. Fergus, 30 Ohio Law. Abs. 508, 1939 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 884 (Ohio Ct. App. 1939).
30 Ohio Law. Abs. 508 (Tucker v. Fergus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State, Ex Rel. Moore v. Smith, Sheriff
85 N.E.2d 608 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)
State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. Moore
82 N.E.2d 323 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)