Tucker v. Fergus
30 Ohio Law. Abs. 508, 1939 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 884
This text of 30 Ohio Law. Abs. 508 (Tucker v. Fergus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tucker v. Fergus, 30 Ohio Law. Abs. 508, 1939 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 884 (Ohio Ct. App. 1939).
Opinion
OPINION
The above entitled cause is now being determined on defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff-appellant’s appeal on the grounds that she has not complied with Rule VII of this Court, not having filed her assignments of error and brief within fifty days of the filing of her notice of intention to appeal.
Motion sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State, Ex Rel. Moore v. Smith, Sheriff
85 N.E.2d 608 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)
State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. Moore
82 N.E.2d 323 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 Ohio Law. Abs. 508, 1939 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-fergus-ohioctapp-1939.