State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

722 N.E.2d 72, 87 Ohio St. 3d 567
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 2000·No. No. 99-1256·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Parole Bd. (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 140, 684 N.E.2d 1227; State ex rel. Finfrock v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 639, 687 N.E.2d 761. Even if Milner had filed a habeas corpus petition rather than erroneously seeking immediate release from prison through mandamus, the fatal defect caused by Milner’s failure to attach commitment papers to his petition was not cured by any subsequent submission of these papers. Boyd v. Money (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 388, 389, 696 N.E.2d 568, 569.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, 722 N.E.2d 72, 87 Ohio St. 3d 567 (Ohio 2000).

722 N.E.2d 72 (State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Arroyo v. Sloan
2014 Ohio 3770 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State ex rel. Bray v. Brigano
2001 Ohio 1587 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
2000 Ohio 226 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
733 N.E.2d 609 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
2000 Ohio 247 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)