State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
733 N.E.2d 609, 89 Ohio St. 3d 496
This text of 733 N.E.2d 609 (State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, 733 N.E.2d 609, 89 Ohio St. 3d 496 (Ohio 2000).
Opinion
Appellant had adequate legal remedies to raise his claims. Moreover, habeas corpus, not mandamus, is the proper action to seek release from prison. See [497]*497State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 567, 568, 722 N.E.2d 72. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Akbar-El v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas
2002 Ohio 475 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
State ex rel. Akbar-El v. Court of Common Pleas
761 N.E.2d 624 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
State ex rel. Bennett v. White
2001 Ohio 1615 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Stovall v. Jones
2001 Ohio 80 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Bealler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
740 N.E.2d 1100 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Bealler v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
2001 Ohio 231 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
2000 Ohio 226 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
733 N.E.2d 609, 89 Ohio St. 3d 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carter-v-ohio-adult-parole-authority-ohio-2000.