State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
This text of 2000 Ohio 226 (State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 496.]
THE STATE EX REL. CARTER, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2000-Ohio-226.] Judgment of court of appeals affirmed. (No. 99-2108—Submitted April 26, 2000—Decided August 30, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-235. __________________ Paul Mancino, Jr., for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jihad M. Smaili, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant had adequate legal remedies to raise his claims. Moreover, habeas corpus, not mandamus, is the proper action to seek release from prison. See State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 567, 568, 722 N.E.2d 72. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 226, 89 Ohio St. 3d 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carter-v-ohio-adult-parole-auth-ohio-2000.