State ex rel. Manos v. Speese

699 N.E.2d 96, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1423, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2473
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1998·No. 98-1684·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed evidence and a brief, due August 27,1998, in compliance with S.CtPrac.R. X(9) and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, sua sponte. See State ex reí SuperAmeriea Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 685 N.E.2d 507.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Manos v. Speese, 699 N.E.2d 96, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1423, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2473 (Ohio 1998).

699 N.E.2d 96 (State ex rel. Manos v. Speese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Manos v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections
1998 Ohio 712 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel. Manos v. Speese
700 N.E.2d 880 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel. Manos v. Delaware County Board of Elections
701 N.E.2d 371 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)