State ex rel. Manos v. Speese
This text of 699 N.E.2d 96 (State ex rel. Manos v. Speese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed evidence and a brief, due August 27,1998, in compliance with S.CtPrac.R. X(9) and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, sua sponte. See State ex reí SuperAmeriea Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 685 N.E.2d 507.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 N.E.2d 96, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1423, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-manos-v-speese-ohio-1998.