State ex rel. Lockhart v. Armistead

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Lockhart v. Armistead

345 So. 2d 898, 1977 La. LEXIS 5224

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 25, 1977

DocketNo. 59665

StatusPublished

This text of 345 So. 2d 898 (State ex rel. Lockhart v. Armistead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Lockhart v. Armistead, 345 So. 2d 898, 1977 La. LEXIS 5224 (La. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Major Field Lockhart applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and habeas corpus.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Cecil C. Lowe, Judge of the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Webster, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 15th day of June, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a day to be fixed by this court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Major Field Lockhart applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and habeas corpus.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Cecil C. Lowe, Judge of the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Webster, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 15th day of June, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a day to be fixed by this court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 898, 1977 La. LEXIS 5224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lockhart-v-armistead-la-1977.