State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. Simpson

166 So. 262, 122 Fla. 670
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 25, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 166 So. 262 (State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. Simpson, 166 So. 262, 122 Fla. 670 (Fla. 1936).

Opinions

On Rehearing Granted.

Per Curiam.

A rehearing having been granted in these several causes by order entered herein under date of January 24, 1936, and each of the above styled causes and proceedings' having been fully and at length reargued before the Supreme Court sitting en banc, all of the Justices thereof being present and participating, and the several causes having now been fully reconsidered, and the Court now being advised of its opinion and judgment in the premises, it is thereupon considered, ordered and adjudged by this Court that the several opinions heretofore agreed to and adopted by a majority of this' Court in the cases of State, ex rel. *672 Lane Drug Stores, v. Simpson (decided November 26, 1935); State, ex rel. Thomas B. Adams, v. Lee (decided November 27, 1935), and State, ex rel. X-Cel Stores, Inc., v. Lee (decided January 14, 1936), be and the same are hereby readopted and agreed to by the majority of the Justices now participating in the decision of these several cases on rehearing, and further, that all appropriate orders and judgments in conformity to such opinions that have been heretofore entered, be and the same are hereby reinstated and made'the several judgments and orders of this Court in the premises with like force and effect as originally entered.

Opinions heretofore filed readopted on rehearing, and appropriate judgments entered in conformity therewith.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Buford, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plumley v. Hale
594 P.2d 497 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1979)
Driver v. Van Cott
257 So. 2d 541 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. Bledsoe
31 So. 2d 457 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
Carlton v. Grimes
23 N.W.2d 883 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1946)
Jordan v. Gessner
15 So. 2d 189 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
State Ex Rel. Cole v. Keller
176 So. 176 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Lee
171 So. 333 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Davis
169 So. 199 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 262, 122 Fla. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lane-drug-stores-inc-v-simpson-fla-1936.